macro_constructor_t Class Reference

Proxy of C++ macro_constructor_t class.

Inheritance diagram for macro_constructor_t:

Public Member Functions
"bool"	build_macro (self, *args)
	build_macro(self, insn, may_go_forward) -> bool Try to extend the instruction.
	__init__ (self, *args)
	init(self) -> macro_constructor_t
	__disown__ (self)

Properties
	thisown = property(lambda x: x.this.own(), lambda x, v: x.this.own(v), doc="The membership flag")
	reserved = property(_ida_ua.macro_constructor_t_reserved_get, _ida_ua.macro_constructor_t_reserved_set, doc=)

Constructor & Destructor Documentation

__init__()

__init__	(		self,
		*	args )

Parameters

self	PyObject *

Member Function Documentation

__disown__()

__disown__

(

self

)

build_macro()

"bool" build_macro	(		self,
		*	args )

Parameters

insn	(C++: insn_t *) Instruction to modify, usually the first instruction of the macro
may_go_forward	(C++: bool) Is it ok to consider the next instruction for the macro? This argument may be false, for example, if there is a cross reference to the end of INSN. In this case creating a macro is not desired. However, it may still be useful to perform minor tweaks to the instruction using the information about the surrounding instructions.

Returns

: true if created an macro instruction. This function may modify 'insn' and return false; these changes will be accepted by the kernel but the instruction will not be considered as a macro.

Property Documentation

reserved

reserved = property(_ida_ua.macro_constructor_t_reserved_get, _ida_ua.macro_constructor_t_reserved_set, doc=)

static

thisown

thisown = property(lambda x: x.this.own(), lambda x, v: x.this.own(v), doc="The membership flag")

static

---

The documentation for this class was generated from the following file:

• ida_ua.py